<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Notes from Stonesthrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Sundry by Brian D Curselor</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/02/10/sundry/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D Curselor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=361#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>Thank you for nice article and If you want to know information about LASIK procedure, laser eye surgery complications, cost, alternatives, online directory of Laser Eye Surgeons that connects prospective patients with a surgeon in their local area. Go to lasikeyesurgeryfaq.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for nice article and If you want to know information about LASIK procedure, laser eye surgery complications, cost, alternatives, online directory of Laser Eye Surgeons that connects prospective patients with a surgeon in their local area. Go to lasikeyesurgeryfaq.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Opposition Governing by Ramon</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/opposition-governing/#comment-3653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=441#comment-3653</guid>
		<description>I know, right? And worse still, the lazy media rely on Drudge to aggregate the &quot;news&quot; for them. (Test this: check Drudge, then watch a few broadcasts and witness the overlap.) And Drudge, too, is grasping at straws--more than during the Clinton impeachment even. Today, for a representative example, the &quot;headline&quot; all day has been &quot;HIGH TIMES: OBAMA TO ISSUE NEW MARIJUANA POLICY,&quot; displayed in screaming green caps beneath a photo of Obama reading something (High Times magazine, surely?) as he stands in a small clutch of schoolchildren. The story? Legalization? Er, no. Another headline down the page: &quot;READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States,&quot; accompanied by a picture depicting Obama as a Maoist. I mean...? All this to say, hear! hear! Zillah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, right? And worse still, the lazy media rely on Drudge to aggregate the &#8220;news&#8221; for them. (Test this: check Drudge, then watch a few broadcasts and witness the overlap.) And Drudge, too, is grasping at straws&#8211;more than during the Clinton impeachment even. Today, for a representative example, the &#8220;headline&#8221; all day has been &#8220;HIGH TIMES: OBAMA TO ISSUE NEW MARIJUANA POLICY,&#8221; displayed in screaming green caps beneath a photo of Obama reading something (High Times magazine, surely?) as he stands in a small clutch of schoolchildren. The story? Legalization? Er, no. Another headline down the page: &#8220;READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States,&#8221; accompanied by a picture depicting Obama as a Maoist. I mean&#8230;? All this to say, hear! hear! Zillah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Patricia J. Weight by Greg</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/patricia-j-weight/#comment-3643</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=418#comment-3643</guid>
		<description>Thanks all:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Patricia J. Weight by Michele</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/patricia-j-weight/#comment-3642</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=418#comment-3642</guid>
		<description>My condolences on the loss of your grandmother. What a beautiful tribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My condolences on the loss of your grandmother. What a beautiful tribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Patricia J. Weight by David</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/patricia-j-weight/#comment-3641</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=418#comment-3641</guid>
		<description>Really lovely, very well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really lovely, very well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Patricia J. Weight by fronesis</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/patricia-j-weight/#comment-3640</link>
		<dc:creator>fronesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=418#comment-3640</guid>
		<description>Beautiful sentiment that&#039;s beautifully written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful sentiment that&#8217;s beautifully written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Up the Hangover by Greg</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/up-the-hangover/#comment-3636</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-3636</guid>
		<description>Oh there was much singing along to Rapture in my house and car, don&#039;t you worry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh there was much singing along to Rapture in my house and car, don&#8217;t you worry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Up the Hangover by Sara</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/up-the-hangover/#comment-3635</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-3635</guid>
		<description>Oh my crush just exploded ten-fold.

I thought I was weird for crushing on Zach during The Hangover, given what a weird, slighty unhygenic character he played. But seeing him lipsync Anita Baker??!! Am I dreaming? I am in love.

(And because you&#039;re you, I will admit that I used to come home from school in the 7th grade to an empty house...an empty house that was soon filled with the smooth jazz of Anita Baker, with whom I would sing along so loud and so continuously, I am still amazed neighbors never complained. And it was always Anita. Except when it was Whitney. Good times.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my crush just exploded ten-fold.</p>
<p>I thought I was weird for crushing on Zach during The Hangover, given what a weird, slighty unhygenic character he played. But seeing him lipsync Anita Baker??!! Am I dreaming? I am in love.</p>
<p>(And because you&#8217;re you, I will admit that I used to come home from school in the 7th grade to an empty house&#8230;an empty house that was soon filled with the smooth jazz of Anita Baker, with whom I would sing along so loud and so continuously, I am still amazed neighbors never complained. And it was always Anita. Except when it was Whitney. Good times.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zzzzzzzzzzz by Lauren</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/zzzzzzzzzzz/#comment-3634</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=405#comment-3634</guid>
		<description>Ask and I shall receive! It&#039;s a bonanza of blogging! Good to have to you back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask and I shall receive! It&#8217;s a bonanza of blogging! Good to have to you back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Iowa by fronesis</title>
		<link>http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/thoughts-on-iowa/#comment-3490</link>
		<dc:creator>fronesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonesthrow.wordpress.com/?p=394#comment-3490</guid>
		<description>The &quot;one man, one woman&quot; argument depends upon an implicit or explicit connection to reproduction and a series of bogus arguments about raising children in heterosexual households.

These arguments can never stand up in court because US law has long recognized what the conservative defense of heterosexual marriage always denies: that marriage has almost NOTHING to do with kids. 

So the only real options, from a legal standpoint, are: 
1) changing the law to let any couple marry.
2) changing the law to let ONLY people marry who can and commit to reproducing.

I don&#039;t think 2 is very likely, but it&#039;s the only shot the &quot;marriage defenders&quot; really have. Well, that and relying on hypocrisy in which the claims about children serve to mask a rather virulent homophobia....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;one man, one woman&#8221; argument depends upon an implicit or explicit connection to reproduction and a series of bogus arguments about raising children in heterosexual households.</p>
<p>These arguments can never stand up in court because US law has long recognized what the conservative defense of heterosexual marriage always denies: that marriage has almost NOTHING to do with kids. </p>
<p>So the only real options, from a legal standpoint, are:<br />
1) changing the law to let any couple marry.<br />
2) changing the law to let ONLY people marry who can and commit to reproducing.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think 2 is very likely, but it&#8217;s the only shot the &#8220;marriage defenders&#8221; really have. Well, that and relying on hypocrisy in which the claims about children serve to mask a rather virulent homophobia&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
