In an evening that will go down in history, Dave, Mike, and I talked endlessly about crap that happened at Ursinus regarding hate speech. In the simplest of re-enactments of said discussion, Dave was a proponent of a quasi-slippery slope argument (you can’t punish people for what they think, plus does it really matter? Also, re: speech, who cares what people say?), while Mike and I argued that hate speech could lead to hate-induced actions, and at the very least creates a hostile environment. I was far too close to this, with students feeling threatened and such, and wasn’t coherent, in many ways.
I’ve thought about that night a lot, and thought about both sides of the hate thought/speech issue, especially of late, what with what I mention below, but also with what the House passed today (with Barney calling out the votes) and what Bush has promised he’ll veto.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, Andrew Sullivan provides a tidy description of the two sides to this issue. I have to say that, when push comes to shove, I’m in the second coherent camp. I recognize the argument about free speech, a particularly relevant concern on a college campus dedicated to engaging with issues in an arena where all opinions can be expressed and then rationally engaged with. I also recognize that it is indeed impossible to see inside the souls of men, and that therefore hate crimes legislation is imperfect at best, Big Brother-like at worst. However, on count one, I don’t see how an eighteen-year-old can engage in thoughtful discourse after his friend’s door had names scrawled on it. And, I would hope that most hate crimes are judged by hard evidence–that is, what a person says or does that evinces hatred–and not guesses at inclination.
I don’t know. It’s not perfect, but I’m still convinced that language has power, good and evil
An aside: tonight’s Ugly Betty featured a plot where all of the secretaries (or, as Betty kept reminding people, “administrative professionals”) celebrated their day at “The Middle Ages,” a “Medieval Times” knock-off. As the fabulous Marc and Amanda enter the place, so too does the evil straight guy Nick (assistant to trans Alexis, of course). Nick says loudly, “this place is so gay”; without missing a beat, Marc says, “it so isn’t.” It’s another example of how this show is so smart about anti-gay behavior and words–defusing them with wit and support from others. Unfortunately, life isn’t scripted by fun writers and doesn’t have happy endings all the time.
I dunno.